Construction company search in Ukraine: a verified internal test snapshot

Cold Outreach: Basics

Construction company search in Ukraine: a verified internal test snapshot

A dated internal test with 2,089 company records: exact search settings, count definitions, verification evidence and what the results cannot prove.

IntelliReach Editorial Team·3m·Oct 16, 2026
Construction company search in Ukraine: a verified internal test snapshot

Practical takeaway

Use this article as a checklist before the next campaign launch so the outbound process stays consistent.

Article metadata

Updated: Oct 17, 2026

Can IntelliReach find construction companies in Ukraine? In one internal test, the stored search results contained 2,089 distinct company records and 1,890 distinct email addresses when inspected on 16 October 2026. This is a dated, unfinished search snapshot, not a customer sales case, a current plan allowance or a forecast for your search.

What was the exact search input?

SettingStored value
Business categoryConstruction, engineering and building services
GeographyUkraine, countrywide; no cities selected
Narrower subcategory / exact business typeNone selected
Business preferencesOffline/local or hybrid
Company websiteRequired

These are the recorded configuration fields. The original chat prompt is not included in the evidence. The category is broad: it does not establish that every stored company installs heating systems or is a qualified buyer for a particular offer. A narrower task should specify the relevant work, region and business need.

What did the snapshot actually contain?

MeasureCountWhat it means
Candidate evaluations8,3298,209 database-source evaluations and 120 web-source evaluations; not unique candidates
Distinct stored companies2,089Company records in this campaign's result collection
Companies with a stored email1,552A company count, not an address count
Distinct stored email addresses1,890Addresses deduplicated after trimming and case normalization
Addresses with a recent positive provider check631The narrower verification definition below
Recorded email sends0Both inspected sending-record representations contained no sends

The campaign was still marked running and in test mode. These figures were obtained through separate read-only queries, not an atomic database snapshot. They describe that observation and do not promise the same result size, source coverage or contact availability for a new campaign.

Why isn't 8,329 → 2,089 an acceptance funnel?

The 8,329 value counts evaluations across source executions, attempts and search revisions. A reliable total of unique candidates was not recorded in this evidence. The source decision counters also do not reconcile directly with the current result collection. Dividing 2,089 by 8,329 would therefore not prove an acceptance rate. This evidence contains no verified row-level sample or reasons for each acceptance and rejection; we cannot claim that every result passed a manual relevance review.

For your own review, open a small sample of company websites and check the actual services, service area and connection to your offer. Reject a company from your outreach shortlist if those facts do not match your requirement or cannot be established. This is a suggested review checklist, not a claim that this test performed that manual review.

What do the 631 positively checked addresses mean?

All 1,890 addresses had a stored checked flag, but that flag alone is not the definition of a recent positive provider check. The 631 count requires checked and safe-to-send flags, a named Reoon or No2Bounce provider record, and a check date from 18 June through 16 October 2026. Checks outside this 120-day window are excluded.

Contact records and verification results may have been reused from the company database. The snapshot does not show that 631 checks were purchased or performed during this search. A positive check is not proof of delivery today, consent, recipient interest or permission to send without the remaining campaign and mailbox checks.

What cannot be concluded about cost, speed or sales?

Search runtime and credit expenditure were not established in the collected evidence. The source timestamps span multiple attempts and are not a measured end-to-end execution time. No message was recorded as sent, so this test provides no reply rate, meeting count, sales conversion or revenue result. It also provides no comparison with another tool.

How should I use this example?

Use it to distinguish company relevance, contact availability and verification freshness. Before starting your own search, review the current plan and sending rules; the historical 2,089-company snapshot does not define today's Free limit. For a location-specific alternative, follow the Google Maps guide. Then review individual results before preparing outreach.

Google Maps search guide · Plans and credit costs · Data sources and verification